fix: when show template is enabled, insert in post content area instead - #3737
Open
Arukuen wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
fix: when show template is enabled, insert in post content area instead#3737Arukuen wants to merge 1 commit into
Arukuen wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe Design Library button now inserts into the first ChangesDesign Library template-locked flow
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes Suggested reviewers: 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
🤖 Pull request artifacts
|
|
Size Change: +53 B (0%) Total Size: 2.64 MB 📦 View Changed
ℹ️ View Unchanged
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
e2e/tests/design-library.spec.ts (1)
83-85: 🎯 Functional Correctness | 🔵 Trivial | ⚡ Quick winAssert the insertion root.
The test verifies that the modal opens, but it does not verify that the inserted
stackable/design-libraryblock uses the firstcore/post-contentclient ID. Add this assertion so the test covers the behavior changed by this PR. The block-editor selectors expose the required client IDs and root relationship. (developer.wordpress.org)Suggested assertion
await openDesignLibrary( page ) + const { postContentClientId, designLibraryRootClientId } = + await page.evaluate( () => { + const blockEditor = window.wp.data.select( 'core/block-editor' ) + const [ postContentClientId ] = + blockEditor.getBlocksByName( 'core/post-content' ) + const [ designLibraryClientId ] = + blockEditor.getBlocksByName( 'stackable/design-library' ) + + return { + postContentClientId, + designLibraryRootClientId: + blockEditor.getBlockRootClientId( designLibraryClientId ), + } + } ) + expect( designLibraryRootClientId ).toBe( postContentClientId ) + await expect( page.locator( '.ugb-modal-design-library' ) ).toBeVisible()🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@e2e/tests/design-library.spec.ts` around lines 83 - 85, Extend the test after openDesignLibrary in design-library.spec.ts to assert that the inserted stackable/design-library block uses the first core/post-content block’s client ID as its insertion root. Use the block-editor selectors and root relationship exposed by the existing test utilities, while preserving the modal visibility assertion.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Nitpick comments:
In `@e2e/tests/design-library.spec.ts`:
- Around line 83-85: Extend the test after openDesignLibrary in
design-library.spec.ts to assert that the inserted stackable/design-library
block uses the first core/post-content block’s client ID as its insertion root.
Use the block-editor selectors and root relationship exposed by the existing
test utilities, while preserving the modal visibility assertion.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 69cc9b63-0394-4120-9afb-61d039d2b80d
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
e2e/tests/design-library.spec.tssrc/plugins/design-library-button/design-library-button.js
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
fixes #3735
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Tests